Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Meriden Orthopaedic Group, P.C.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 10, 2003No. AC 21841PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*308 Opinion
FLYNN, J.
In this medical malpractice action, the plaintiff, James Friedman, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury verdict for the defendants Meriden Orthopaedic Group, P.C., and Paul Zimmering, a surgeon who was employed by the defendant corporation. Specifically, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly found that he failed to lay an adequate foundation to admit the portion of the deposition testimony of a board certified neuroradiologist regarding the standard of care applicable to an orthopedic surgeon. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Th…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Gaudio v. Griffin Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Ardoline v. KeeganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Cross v. HuttenlocherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Farrell v. BassConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Friedman v. Meriden Orthopaedic Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. John G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. CaldrelloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Friedman v. Meriden Orthopaedic Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003