United States v. Ronald Lee Harper
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
We affirm the conviction of petitioner Ronald Lee Harper for possession and dispensing of cocaine, rejecting his sole contention on appeal that the classification of cocaine as a Schedule II narcotic drug under 21 U.S.C. § 812(c) is arbitrary and irrational.
Numerous district courts have recently dealt with this argument. United States v. Amidzich, 396 F.Supp. 1140, 1147 (E. D.Wis.1975); United States v. Hobbs, 392 F.Supp. 444, 446 (D.Mass.1975); United States v. DiLaura, 394 F.Supp. 770, 773 (D.Mass.1974); United States v. Brookins, 383 F.Supp. 1212, 1217 (D.N.J. 1974). In all cases,…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. BrookinsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
- Duffy, Warden v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. AmidzichDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975
- United States v. CastroDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Odell MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Irving Davis, M. D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- People v. McCartyIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- United States v. Jaime Vila, Narcisco Guzman, and Luis HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.