People v. Fann
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Douglas S. Wong, J.
These two cases have been consolidated for motions by all parties. They present the same issue to this court. Each defendant was convicted of a misdemeanor and sentenced to probation. A violation of probation (hereafter VOP) was filed on each case by the Department of Probation. Defense counsels on each case requested that the defendant be examined pursuant to CPL 730.30. Both Brisken and Fann were found unfit to proceed. By statute they were ordered to be committed to the custody of the Commissioner of Mental Hygiene. (CPL 730.40 [1]; 730.50 [1].) The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Darvin M. v. JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. QuallsOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Mayfield v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Newcomb v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Donald v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.