Legal Opinion
State Bar Grievance Administrator v. Jaques
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1979No. 58697, (Calendar Nos. 1, 8)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
(to vacate order of the Grievance Board). I must respectfully disagree with the opinion of the Chief Justice.
Following publication of my original opinion in this case, affirming in part the decision of the State Bar Grievance Board and suspending respondent from the practice of law for two years, the United States Supreme Court decided Ohralik v Ohio State Bar Ass’n, 436 US 447; 98 S Ct 1912; 56 L Ed 2d 444 (1978). Thereafter that Court directed us to reconsider our original decision in light of Ohralik, supra.
Having done so, I am persuaded that Ohralik forbids us to construe this state’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- O'QUINN v. State Bar of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Woll v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- In re KofflerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- In re GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.