Legal Opinion

State v. Hodgdon

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 17, 1915PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Information charging respondent and three others with statutory burglary. Plea, not guilty. Joint trial by jury at the June Term, 1914, Caledonia County, Fish, J., presiding, but the respondents severed in their defences. Verdict, guilty as to all, and judgment and sentences thereon. The respondents severally excepted. Heard in Supreme Court only as to respondent Frank IT. Hodgdon. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

This is an information charging this respondent and two others with burglary. All were found guilty, and thereupon the court rendered judgment and imposed sentence upon each, and the respondents excepted. The case of Hodgdon was heard in this Court by itself, and here stands alone, the case having been continued as to the other respondents.

Bach respondent was defended by separate counsel, and it sufficiently appears, as indeed it is claimed by counsel for Hodgdon, in one part of their brief, that they did not make a common defence.

Hodgdon took the stand as a witness, and the court permitted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McGovern v. HaysSupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
  2. State v. ShawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
  3. James v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Kidd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated November 16, 1974District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  2. Paska v. SaundersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  3. State v. BarrSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
  4. Paul v. DrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  5. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API