Legal Opinion

Deason v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 8, 1978No. 77-457PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Certiorari was granted to enable this Court to determine whether or not the trial court erred in refusing to grant the defendant's motion to require the prosecution to elect among charges of carnal knowledge. The opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals, 363 So.2d 998, refers neither to that motion nor to the colloquy between counsel and the trial court in connection with it. However, the petitioner filed with his application for rehearing in the Court of Criminal Appeals his request for a finding of facts which included that motion and exchange, together with the language of the indictment,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Elam v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  3. Ex Parte State, in re Brooms v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Cochran v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  5. Untreinor v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Ex Parte CoferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Bowden v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Duncan v. State.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. Inmon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API