Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Hamilton County
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 14, 1999No. 98-727PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
527 U.S. 198 (1999)
CUNNINGHAM
v.
HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
No. 98-727.
United States Supreme Court.
Argued April 19, 1999.
Decided June 14, 1999.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
2Opinion of the Court · ThomasThomas, J.
Kennedy, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 210.
Thomas C. Goldstein argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Jonathan D. Schiller and Teresa L. Cunningham.
John J. Arnold argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Carl J. Stich and Shannon M. Reynolds.
2Opinion of the Court · ThomasJustice Thomas
Federal courts of appeals ordinarily have jurisdiction over appeals from "final decisions of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
4Cases cited27 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
5Cited by1 opinion
- Alfred Copeland v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017