Douglas v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Ebeoe to review a judgment of tbe circuit court for Sauk county: E. Eat SteveNS, Circuit Judge. Tbe plaintiff in error was arrested upon tbe charge of bastardy, held for trial, tried in tbe circuit court for Saule county, and found guilty. A motion to set aside tbe verdict and for a new trial was denied, and judgment rendered against him in tbe usual form in such cases, from which this appeal was taken.
1Opinion of the CourtKerwiN, J.
1. The main contention on the part of the plaintiff in error is that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict. We shall not discuss to any considerable extent the facts of the case. There is evidence tending to show that parties other than the plaintiff in error and the complaining witness were connected with the transaction leading up to the final act, but we do not deem it necessary to bring such parties into notice in the treatment of this unfortunate affair. Nor shall we spend time in a discussion of the facts regarding the main contention further than to state generally our…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Buel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Brickley v. WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Ferguson v. TruaxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Hofer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Baker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gregory v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927