People v. Johnson Kosher Meat Products, Inc.
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtEdward J. Greenfield, J.
A seeming paradox is presented in this ease as to whether a person who has apparently complied *535with the law may, nevertheless, be in violation of the law for not proclaiming that he has in fact complied.
Defendant was charged with violations of sections 201-a and 201-c of the Agriculture and Markets Law, in failing to label properly certain meat products sold as kosher. Upon failure at the trial to adduce any evidence that the meat sold as kosher was not prepared wholly in accordance with Hebrew orthodox religious requirements, the charges of fraudulent misrepresentation under section 201-a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- People v. GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- People v. GordonNew York Court of Special Session · 1939
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. RubinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats v. RubinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- New York Horse & Carriage Ass'n v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1989