Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats v. Rubin
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GERSHON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Long Island merchants servicing consumers of kosher products, challenge the constitutionality of the New York Agriculture and Markets Law § 201-a, et seq. (“the Kosher Laws”). In December 1996, several Jewish organizations, a rabbi, a competitor of plaintiffs, and individual consumers of kosher products were jointly permitted to intervene as defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b)(2). 1 Defendant, the Director of the Kosher Law Enforcement Division of the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, now moves…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kachalsky v. CacaceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. RubinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000