Legal Opinion

Hendershot v. Charleston National Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1990No. 27S02-9011-CV-746Published

1Opinion of the Court

563 N.E.2d 546 (1990)

William P. HENDERSHOT, Appellant (Defendant below),

v.

CHARLESTON NATIONAL BANK, Appellee (Plaintiff below).

No. 27S02-9011-CV-746.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

November 27, 1990.

C. Robert Rittman, Biddinger & Johnson, Marion, for appellant.

Michael J. Kiley, Kiley, Osborn, Kiley, Harker, Rogers, Michael & Certain, Marion, David L. Wyant, Shuman, Annand & Poe, Charleston, W. Va., for appellee.

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

This case presents an issue of first impression: whether a guarantor or surety[1] is released from his obligation when a creditor settles with and releases the primary…

Also in this document: Dissent · Pivarnik; Dissent · Pivarnik.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gholson v. SavinOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. AkwaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Lutz v. Frick Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1962
  4. SEC. Nat. Bank of Kansas City v. Continental Ins.District Court, D. Kansas · 1982
  5. Warner Lambert Pharmaceutical Company v. SylkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API