Dinh Tan Ho v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING 1
LESLIE BROCK YATES, Justice.
This is an appeal from a murder conviction. Appellant Dinh Tan Ho argues in seven issues that the trial court erred by (1) denying appellant’s motion for continuance, (2) admitting appellant’s alleged co-actors’ recanted statements to police, (3) admitting extraneous offense evidence, (4) improperly limiting appellant’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation, (5) admitting evidence of appellant’s gang membership during the punishment phase of trial, (6) denying appellant’s motion for mistrial, and (7) denying appellant’s motion for new trial.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Weatherred v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Heidelberg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- Jason Alexander Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Nathan G. Mims v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
- Espinosa v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.