Southern Railway Co. v. Mecklenburg County
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
That the cost of maintaining a rural police force in Mecklenburg County for the better enforcement of the law and the security of the public safety is a necessary expense of county government is conceded. Is it a “general purpose” or a “special purpose” expense within the meaning of Art. V, sec. 6 of the Constitution ? This is the one question posed for decision. The court below answered in favor of plaintiff. In this conclusion we concur.
The creation of counties as subdivisions of the state originated in England even before the organization of the kingdom itself. Bignell v. Cummins, 36…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Henderson v. . WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Bignell v. CumminsMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Power Co. v. . Clay CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Commissioners v. Stedman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wood v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Harter v. VernonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Boyd v. Robeson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Washington v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.