Legal Opinion

Scott v. Conrad

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1913No. 3632PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Yuma District Court. Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

Lincoln R. Scott, appellant here, brought this action to quiet title to the northeast quarter of section 34, township 3 south, range 43 west, the complaint being in the usual form under section 255 of the civil code. The pleadings are voluminous; the evidence offered at the trial, brief and undisputed.

Plaintiff, at arid for a few days prior to the beginning of the suit, was the ostensible owner of the fee simple title to said lands, unless said title had been extinguished by the treasurer’s tax deed hereinafter mentioned. Plaintiff took his title by quitclaim deed dated on or about April 6th,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morris & Thombs v. St. Louis National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  2. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lacombe v. HeadleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API