State v. Levert
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant avers that the compulsory process clause of Section 10 of Article I of the Constitution of Ohio guarantees him the right to have the jury hear the results of his polygraph examination. In essence, we are urged to extend the holding in State v. Souel (1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 123, 372 N. E. 2d 1318, wherein the prerequisites for the admissibility of polygraph evidence are set forth. We are unconvinced that a departure from the safeguards enumerated in Souel is required or would be wise at this time.
Appellant contends further, without citing supporting authority, that the exclusion of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. BaylessOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. SouelOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Jones v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. JamisonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Leis v. KraftOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. KennedyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. WhitmeyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.