Legal Opinion
Charles Bertini v. Apple Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 9, 2026No. 5:24-cv-03437Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CHARLES BERTINI, Case No. 24-cv-03437-VKD 8 Plaintiff, 9 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S 10 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPLE INC., THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 92 12 13 In this trademark action, plaintiff Charles Bertini moves for leave to file a third amended 14 complaint (“TAC”) to reassert several claims for fraud. Dkt. Nos. 92, 94. Defendant Apple Inc. 15 (“Apple”) opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 93. The matter is deemed suitable for determination 16…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music PublishingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Tamer Salameh v. Tarsadia HotelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Patrick Novak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.