Legal Opinion

Thompson Foundry & Machine Co. v. United States

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided August 14, 1946No. Civil Action No. 138PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, District Judge.

This case arises under the Contract Settlement Act of 1944, 41 U.S.C.A. § 101 el seq. The plaintiff entered into a contract with the United States Maritime Commission on the 11th of November, 1943, to manufacture 100 ship sets of line shaft bearings at a total contract price of $96,-500. On April 29, 1944, the contract was cancelled by the contracting agency and the plaintiff claimed damages in the sum of $20,326.15. He filed his claim and proofs, as required by the Act, and the contracting agency made findings allowing the plaintiff $10,493.90, and within thirty days…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. John H. Vandermolen v. John C. Stetson, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. Pioneer Gen-E-Motor Corp. v. Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1955
  3. Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1951
  4. United States v. CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  5. John H. Vandermolen v. John C. Stetson, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API