State v. Hamann
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Lyon District Court. — Hon. George W.. Wakeeielb, Judge. Ti-ie defendant was convicted of the crime of seduction,, and appeals from the judgment thereon.
1Opinion of the CourtSiierwin, J.
*3681 2 *367The trial court instructed in the language following in one of its paragraphs: “The exact amount or kind of seductive arts necessary to constitute seduction cannot be defined, but there must be some artificial or false promise or flattery or deception by which the virtuous female is induced to surrender her person to the accused. * * * Seduction may be made out by the practice of arts,- or by flattery, or by deception, or by false representations. You will consider all the facts and circumstances-in evidence, and determine therefrom whether the alleged *368sexual intercourse between defendant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. HamannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. Middle States Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Gadsden County Tobacco Co. v. CorrySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Patrick v. Cochise Hotels, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953