Legal Opinion

Batris W. Perovich v. Glens Falls Insurance Company, a New York Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 25, 1968No. 21609_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOLOMON, District Judge:

In 1961, Glens Falls Insurance Company paid Batris W. Perovich $10,268.35 to compensate him for the theft of equipment insured by Glens Falls.' Glens Falls later discoverd that Perovich had made numerous material misrepresentations of the value of the stolen goods. Under the terms of the insurance contract, these misrepresentations voided the contract, and Glens Falls sued for a refund. Perovich appeals from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict for Glens Falls.

Perovich first contends that there was insufficient evidence that he misrepresented value. There is no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Elkind v. WoodwardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Floyd Baldwin v. Bankers & Shippers Insurance Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Orient Handel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Chierfue Her v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
  3. Quintin v. Daniel Miller & Cooperative Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  4. Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Green Earth Management, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  5. Jim Sicilia, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant--Appellee v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant--Appellant. Jim Sicilia, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant--Appellant v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant--Appellee. Jim Sicilia, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant--Appellant v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant--Appellee. Jim Sicilia, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant--Appellee v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant--AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API