Legal Opinion

Doe v. Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 2008No. 34051PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order appointing the Appellants as guardians of their grandson but refusing to also grant them custody under Idaho Code § 32-717(3). We dismiss the appeal as moot, but instruct the magistrate judge to correct a reference to the wrong code section in the order.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Appellants are the maternal grandparents of a child born on May 16, 2003. The child has resided with the Appellants since his birth, and they have been his sole caretakers and providers. The child’s parents were not married.

Appellants filed this action on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Revello v. RevelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Goodson v. Nez Perce County BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Webb v. WebbIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Dorman v. YoungIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Arambarri v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Daniel Paslay v. A&B Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Suter v. BiggersIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Re: Guardianship: Bond v. RoundIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Mc Lean v. Cheyovich Family TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API