Legal Opinion

United States v. Stephen McFadden

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 21, 2014No. 13-4349PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KEENAN wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judge WILKINSON joined.

BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal concerns a defendant’s convictions involving the sale of “designer drugs,” in violation of the Controlled Sub stance Analogue Enforcement Act of 1986 (the Act), 21 U.S.C. §§ 802(32)(A), 813. Stephen D. McFadden was convicted by a jury of nine charges stemming from his distribution of substances that the government alleged were prohibited by the Act. On appeal,. McFadden primarily asserts that the Act is unconstitutionally vague…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McFadden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. United States v. Jorge CornellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Stephen McFaddenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  4. State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. ShalashOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API