General Plant Protection Corp. v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Frantz
Referee, Industrial Commission, and the District Court of Denver have successively considered the evidence adduced at the hearing on this claim for compensation, and each in due course has responded favorably to the claimant. Considering themselves aggrieved, the employer and the insuror seek reversal of the judgment confirming the award. In this respect we should be mindful that they “may have questions of law only reviewed summarily by the supreme court, by writ of error.” C.R.S. ’53, 81-14-17.
Findings based on conflicting evidence do not create a reviewable problem for this court, since…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Alexander Film Company v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Comstock v. BivensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Lyttle v. State Compensation Insurance FundSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Gutheil v. PolichioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.