Legal Opinion

Winston v. Guelzow

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 26, 2014No. 2013AP2764PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOVER, EJ.

¶ 1. Scott Winston and Guelzow & Winston, Ltd. (Winston Law) appeal a money judgment obtained against Thomas Guelzow and Guelzow Law Offices, Ltd. (Guelzow Law). Winston argues that the court erroneously determined he was not entitled to a share of certain contingency fees obtained by Guelzow after the two terminated their joint law practice, and that the court erroneously failed to award prejudgment interest. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2. This case involves a fee dispute between two personal-injury attorneys who practiced together for several years and then parted ways. Guelzow hired…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  2. Noll v. Dimiceli's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  3. State v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  4. Phelps v. Physicians InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Tonn v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Horner v. BagnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  2. Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Illinois Bell Telephone CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
  3. Mosler v. GeraceSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API