Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Underwood

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 27, 1988No. 86-1512PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

487 U.S. 552 (1988)

PIERCE, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

v.

UNDERWOOD ET AL.

No. 86-1512.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued December 1, 1987

Decided June 27, 1988

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

Deputy Solicitor General Merrill argued the cause for petitioner. On the briefs were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Willard, Deputy Solicitor General Lauber, Charles A. Rothfeld, William Kanter, John S. Koppel, and Gershon M. Ratner.

Mary S. Burdick argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief was Richard A. Rothschild.[*]

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Scalia; Concurring in the judgment; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Francisco Gasca-RuizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. (SS) Black v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. (SS) Hill v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. (SS) Ohman v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (SS) Silva v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API