State v. PAK

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

Appellant challenges his assault and emergency-call-interference convictions, arguing that he was prejudiced at trial by evidentiary errors. The district court abused its discretion by excluding appellant’s proffered character evidence, but we conclude that the error was harmless. We reject the balance of appellant’s claims of error and therefore affirm.

FACTS

Following an altercation between appellant Henry H. Pak and his wife H.E.P., respondent State of Minnesota charged appellant with: (I) interference with an emergency call in violation of MinmStat. § 609.78, subd. 2…