Legal Opinion
Sawyers v. United Parcel Service
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 16, 2013No. Civil Action No. GLR-12-3183PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GEORGE L. RUSSELL, III, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant United Parcel Service’s (“UPS”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Concetta M. Sawyers’ First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 15). Sawyers alleges harassment, sex and religious discrimination, and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (2012). (ECF No. 11). The Court, having reviewed the pleadings and supporting documents, finds no hearing necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md. 2011).
For the reasons stated herein, UPS’ Motion…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Williams v. Silver Spring Volunteer Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Sillah v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Sawyers v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Bagwell v. Downtown Partnership of Baltimore, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Correa v. The Rector and Visitors of the University of VirginiaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2025
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.