Jackson v. Department of Justice
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
This case requires us to interpret provisions of the Roberti-Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989 (Pen. Code, §§ 12275-12290) (the AWCA or Act), 1 which have not heretofore been judicially construed. The questions presented are whether, under that Act, a licensed gun dealer can acquire, possess and sell unregistered assault weapons and whether he may hold assault weapons registered to others for sale on consignment. The trial court answered both questions in the negative and concluded that petitioner’s violations of the AWCA justified denial of his application to renew…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Kasler v. LockyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission v. Town of EmeryvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martini E Ricci Lamino S.P.A.-Consortile Societa Agricola v. Trinity Fruit Sales Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Martini E Ricci Iamino S.P.A.—Consortile Societa Agricola v. Western Fresh Marketing Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Opinion No. (2005), California Attorney General Reports2005
- Opinion No. (2010), California Attorney General Reports2010