Legal Opinion

Huber v. Huber

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1984No. 468PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, Judge:

This is an appeal, by Elaine E. Huber, appellant, from an order of the trial court sitting en banc overruling her exceptions to the trial judge’s order that dismissed her complaint in assumpsit. On appeal, she claims that the trial court erred in ruling that a post-nuptial contract executed by her and her former husband, Robert R. Huber, appellee, was against public policy and unenforceable as a matter of law. We reverse.

Elaine and Robert were married on August 16, 1952. During their marriage, they had four children. On October 25, 1976, they entered into a post-nuptial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Perkins v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Forbes v. ForbesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Rohr v. Keystone InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Craig's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Maryann Spinetti v. Service Corporation International and Service Corporation International of Pennsylvania D/B/A Lafayette Memorial ParkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  2. Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Stewart v. GGNSC-Canonsburg, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Parker v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Wertz v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API