Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Woolley

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 20, 1976No. 74-271-AppealPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoris, J.

This is a petition to foreclose a taxpayer’s right of redemption brought pursuant to the provisions of G. L. 1956 (1970 Reenactment) chapter 9 of title 44. The petition to foreclose was heard by a Superior Court justice who denied the petition but ordered the petitioner’s promissory note to respondent cancelled and denied respondent’s claim for compensation for repairs. The respondent Suburban Land Company (Suburban) has appealed. The question to be decided by us is the scope of jurisdiction granted to the Superior Court by chapter 9 of title 44.

The pertinent facts are as follows. In 1969,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Town of Norwood v. Norwood Civic Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  2. Picerne v. SylvestreSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  3. Charland v. Trustees of the Home for Aged WomenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Lewis v. PalmerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Parker v. MacCueSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Albertson v. LecaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  2. Rhode Island State Police Lodge No. 25 v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  3. ABAR Associates v. LunaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  4. Jeanne E. Johnson v. QBAR AssociatesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  5. Medeiros v. Bankers Trust Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API