Legal Opinion

LaDu v. Oregon Clinic, P.C.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 1, 2000No. 9804-02472; CA A103697Published

1Opinion of the Court

998 P.2d 733 (2000)

165 Or. App. 687

Mary Shaidaee LaDU, Personal Representative of the Estate of Baby LaDu, and Mary Shaidaee LaDu, Appellants,

v.

OREGON CLINIC, P.C., Erik P. Eselius and Kelvin Chiu Yu, Respondents.

(9804-02472; CA A103697).

Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc.

Argued and Submitted September 14, 1999.

Resubmitted January 26, 2000.

Decided March 1, 2000.

Carl G. Kiss argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Paulson and Baisch Trial Lawyers.

Kelly A. Giampa argued the cause for respondents Oregon Clinic, P.C. and Erik P. Eselius. Lindsey H. Hughes argued the cause for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Granewich v. HardingOregon Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API