People v. Beeler
California Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
BAXTER, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court did not err in its handling of the circumstances that arose on the death of Juror Coley’s father. I concur, however, in the majority’s judgment affirming defendant’s conviction and death sentence because the record on appeal does not provide a basis for determining that the error was prejudicial.
Put simply, the situation was this: Juror Coley’s father had died within a few hours before Coley returned to court on Tuesday for the third day of penalty deliberations. Coley told the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. AshmusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Hawes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- People v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. Victor Harvey SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- In Re MendesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.