Legal Opinion

May v. Waniger

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Hidalgo County Court; J. H. Edwards, Judge. Action by J. T. Waniger against 'Harry May. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEly, C. J.

This is a suit on a joint and several promissory note for $1,000, payable to appellee, executed by the John Gowdy Manufacturing Company, Harry May, and E. S. Short. Only May was sued, and it was alleged that he had guaranteed the payment of the note by signing a contemporaneous written contract. Appellant answered that he had signed the note as a guarantor with E. L. Short for the John Gowdy Manufacturing Company, that appellee knew that he had signed the note only as a guarantor, and that the People’s Manufacturing Company had .been substituted for the John Gowdy Manufacturing Company, as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gardner v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Lemp v. ArmengolTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Stein Double Cushion Tire Co. v. Wm. T. Fulton Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Davis v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bank of New England, N.A. v. KleinDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1988
  2. Berry v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. WallerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. WallerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API