State v. Casavant
Supreme Court of Vermont
Indictment for the larceny of a trunk and contents. Trial by jury at the September term, 1891, Tyler, J., presiding. Verdict of guilty. Exceptions by respondent. The opinion states the case. The ownership should have been alleged in Mrs. Gilson, the real owner. Otherwise the respondent may be again prosecuted for the same offence. 2 Rus. Or. 739 and 795; 1 Whar. Am. Crinr. Law, 595.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
TAFT, J.
The property stolen belonged to Mrs. Gilson y living in New Hampshire, to whom it had been assigned as part of an estate at Malone, N. Y. Lincoln E. Spaulding, who had held the property as administrator, was taking it to Mrs. Gilson, he going as a passenger, and it as’ baggage, on a train of the Central Yermont Railroad Company. It was in the company’s, possession, at its station in St. Albans, when stolen. In the indictment as presented, the ownership of the property alleged to have been stolen was laid in said Spaulding. It was amended by…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Kasle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Michele Chiaramonte v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- State v. MullenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- State v. OliverMontana Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.