Legal Opinion

Mosier v. Oklahoma Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 3, 1995No. 78814PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice:

An injured worker received compensation benefits. He also reached a settlement with a manufacturer/defendant in a separate District Court proceeding involving the same injuries. The manufacturer’s liability insurer failed, and the worker looks to the Oklahoma Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association. The only question before us is whether the Association is entitled to setoff the workers’ compensation benefits received by the worker against its obligation to pay. We conclude that such a setoff is allowed by statute.

Kent Mosier was seriously injured while working…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Oglesby v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Senac v. SandeferSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  5. Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Union Carbide Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brennan v. Kansas Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  3. New Hampshire Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Pitco Frialator, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  4. BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  5. Carpenter Tech. Corp. v. Admiral Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API