People v. Shellenberger
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
The defendant was convicted of a violation of section 3 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act (Stats. 1937, chap. 758), which denounces as a felony the ownership or possession of a still used in the production, or capable of being used in the production, of alcoholic beverages, without first having obtained a still license from the State Board of Equalization. Prom the judgment and sentence this appeal is prosecuted.
As the first ground for reversal, it is urged that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, in that the prosecution failed to meet the burden resting upon it to prove…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. RongoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- People v. BillingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- People v. SearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- People v. KiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. TuthillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- People v. KelsoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.