Nunnally v. Strauss
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from a decree of the Chancery Court of the city of Richmond, pronounced May 10, 1891, in a suit in chancery, wherein the appellants “who sue for the benefit of themselves and all other creditors of the York Steel & Iron Company, who will come into this suit and share the benefit and expense of the same,” were the complainants, and the appellees were the defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
*256The York Steel & Iron Company was incorporated under the laws of Yirginia in December, 1890, its declared object being “to acquire and hold real and personal property by purchase, lease, or otherwise, in this or any other state: to sell, lease, or in any legal manner, dispose of or encumber the said property; to lay off any portion of its lands into town or city sites, with lots, streets, alleys, parks and such other improvements as it may deem advisable; to mine iron or other ores or materials, and sell the same; to erect, operate and conduct iron furnaces, gas and water works, electric…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Bank of St. Marys v. St. John, Powers & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1854
3Cited by15 opinions
- Virginia Passenger & Power Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
- Drake v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Baker v. Berry Hill Mineral Springs Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1909
- McKee v. City Garbage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Realty Associates v. Women's ClubOregon Supreme Court · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.