Legal Opinion

Crawford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1977No. KCD 27935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Judge.

On March 18, 1975, the court below denied the movant’s pro se Rule 27.26 motion to vacate his sentence without evidentiary hearing or appointment of counsel. The movant appeals. The judgment is final. This court has the proper appellate jurisdiction. The judgment is affirmed.

The movant contends the trial court erred: in considering prior convictions after jury agreed on guilt and not on punishment when defendant was not charged under Second Offender Act; in assessing punishment after ruling motion for new trial because it denied defendant opportunity to object; in sentencing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Coney v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  4. O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  5. State v. GoforthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PerezMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Westmoreland v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. Sweazea v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Thompson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Clark v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API