Legal Opinion
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided November 10, 2005No. 3:05-0148PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ECHOLS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry No. 11) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and Plaintiffs Rule 12(d) Motion In The Alternative (Docket Entry No. 19) to delay ruling on Defendants’ Motion until trial. The parties have responded in opposition to the Motions.
Plaintiff Colonial Pipeline Company (“Colonial”) brings this action for declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (the Commerce Clause) of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hibbs v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Colonial Pipeline Company v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007