Legal Opinion

Whiteman v. Federal Life Ins.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided February 16, 1939No. 88PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, District Judge.

This is the first motion of its kind that has been presented to me as a judge of this court. I had, of course, given some study, I must admit it has been slight study, to Rule 56, Rules of Civil Procedure for District Courts, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, under which the motion is presented. I think such a motion should be sustained only in a very clear case, a case in which there is no doubt as to how some essential question should be resolved, such an essential question as that when it is resolved adversely to one of the parties, that party cannot prevail.

If there…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. HoffmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
  2. Fishman v. TeterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  3. Division of Industrial Safety v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Chorman v. Foamex International, Inc. (In re Foamex International, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API