City of Coppell v. State ex rel. Burns
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DIXON, Chief Justice.
This is a quo warranto proceeding. It challenges the validity of two disannexation ordinances passed by the Town of Coppell, now known as City of Coppell.
It is the second time the dispute has been before us. The first action was not in the form of quo warranto. We reversed the trial court’s judgment on the ground, among others, that the validity of the dis-annexation ordinances could be questioned only in a quo warranto proceeding. Lusby v. Cozby, 402 S.W.2d 799 (Tex.Civ.App., Dallas 1966, no writ). In conformity with such holding this action was thereafter filed by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Texas-Louisiana Power Co. v. City of FarmersvilleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Plumer v. Houghton & Dutton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- City of Farmersville v. Texas-Louisiana Power Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- State ex rel. Rea v. EtheridgeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.