American Car & Foundry Co. v. Allen
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; David P. Dyer, Judge. Action by Bart Allen against the American Car & Foundry Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
In the court below Bart Allen was the plaintiff in this case and the American Car & Foundry Company, a corporation, was the defendant, and henceforth they will he so called. The defendant was a corporation that owned and operated a large plant, and the plaintiff was it puddle boss. His duties were to have charge of the furnaces and of the general work through the mill, and when there was a man lacking to jump in and take his place. *648The defendant had commenced to build a bathhouse in the fall of 1917, and had erected and inclosed it ready for plastering about three weeks…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Butler v. FrazeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Lake v. Shenango Furnace Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Union Pac. R. v. MaroneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Curran v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
- Federal Electric Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Consolidated Textile Corp. v. ShippCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Haines v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Newberry v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1921