Legal Opinion

Commercial Asphalt, Inc. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 22, 1966No. 44,294PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hatcher, C.:

This action was brought for the purpose of having a sand lease declared unenforceable and the lessees removed from the leased premises.

The case was tried to the court on stipulated facts which will be summarized.

On February 20, 1954, Henry and Emma Koster, husband and wife, entered into a written agreement with the Rig Three Sand and Gravel Company which was executed by the defendant, Frank L. Smith. The agreement specifically described 40 acres in Sedgwick County, Kansas, and continued:

“Whereas, the party of the second part is desirous of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SchippelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Pittsburg Vitrified Paving & Building Brick Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Rowan & Co. v. HullWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Blumenthal v. BridgesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Pullman Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seneca Nursing Home v. The Kansas State Board of Social WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  2. Commercial Asphalt, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  3. Higgins v. Ally Financial Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API