Correll v. Gaskins
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Defendant's assignments of error, based on exceptions duly taken, challenge the sufficiency of the court’s instructions relating to the contributory negligence issue.
G.S. 1-180 requires the trial judge, when instructing the jury, to relate and apply the law to the variant factual situations having support in the evidence. Westmoreland v. Gregory, 255 N.C. 172, 177, 120 S.E. 2d 523, and cases cited. This requirement applies to the statutory law as well as to the common law. Pittman v. Swanson, 255 N.C. 681, 685, 122 S.E. 2d 814, and cases cited; Greene v. Harmon, 260 N.C. 344, 132 S.E. 2d 683.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Melton v. CrottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Westmoreland v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Scarborough v. IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Pittman Ex Rel. Pittman v. SwansonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Superior Foods, Inc. v. Harris-Teeter Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Morpul Research Corp. v. Westover Hardware, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Edwards v. MayesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- North Carolina Board of Transportation v. RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.