Legal Opinion
North Dakota ex rel. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau v. Przybylski
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 9, 1951No. Civ. No. 359PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, Chief Judge.
It seems obvious that the third-party complaint as to the American Company must be dismissed because (1) it fails to allege any grounds upon which the defendants as third-party plaintiffs would be entitled to any relief as against this third-party defendant, and (2) the third-party complaint fails to come within the purview and scope of Rule 14(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, 28 U.S.C.A.
A detailed analysis of the third-party complaint seems unnecessary. It may be observed, however, that it is claimed that the accident to Robinson occurred when certain…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reeves & Co. v. RussellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Wallace v. BrendeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
- Holstlaw v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1949
- Tufty v. Sioux Transit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schweitz v. RobathamNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
- Millsap v. Central Wisconsin Motor Transport Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
- Millsap v. Central Wisconsin Motor Transport Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963