Millsap v. Central Wisconsin Motor Transport Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion
On Rehearing
Plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing is largely a reargument of the points in their original brief. They again assert that although the accident occurred in Wisconsin, defendant’s claim for contribution under Wisconsin law should be dismissed as opposed to our public policy because Illinois follows the common law rule denying contribution to joint tort-feasors. Nevertheless they urge that we should apply the Wisconsin Comparative Negligence Act (Wis Stats 331.045), although Illinois follows the common law rule in denying recovery to plaintiffs who are in any degree contributorily…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Charnock v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. RouseIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Steger v. EgyudCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.