Legal Opinion

State v. Schoene

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 27, 1972No. C-71-03-0960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

Defendant, upon trial without a jury, was found guilty of all charges in a three-count indictment, and given identical sentences to run concurrently on each of the three convictions. The indictment charged defendant and five other persons in three counts: Count I—conspiracy to commit a felony and, to effect the object of the conspiracy, committing the overt act of stealing a 1968 Mack tractor-truck; Count II—larceny by stealing the tractor-truck described in Count I; and Count III—receiving and concealing stolen property —the tractor-truck described in Count I.

On appeal he argues: (1) that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. DaghitaNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. LamiratoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  2. State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. People v. LamiratoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API