Legal Opinion

Novo Nordisk Inc. v. Brooksville Pharmaceuticals Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided May 12, 2025No. 8:23-cv-01503Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION NOVO NORDISK, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:23-cv-1503-WFJ-TGW BROOKSVILLE PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Defendant. ___________________________________/ ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Brooksville Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s (“Brooksville” or “Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment. S-Dkt. 118-2; Dkt. 144. Plaintiff Novo Nordisk, Inc. (“Novo Nordisk” or “Plaintiff”) filed a response in Opposition, S-Dkt. 168-1, to which Defendant filed a Reply, S-Dkt. 176-1. The Court held oral argument on the motion for summary judgment on…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API