Legal Opinion
HULSY v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 2009No. S-08-0257PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] The appellant was convicted by a jury of felony interference with a peace officer. He contends on appeal that he was not adequately advised of the charge against him, and that the evidence was insufficient to prove both of the State's theories of guilt, the result being uncertainty as to whether a unanimous verdict was reached. We affirm.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] The appellant states the issues substantially as follows:
1. Was the appellant denied a unanimous verdict by the State raising alternative theories of causation, when there is insufficient evidence to support both…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Rosalba SolivanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Roquel Allen CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. John CinaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Daniel B. Walker v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Morris Eugene Grimes v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Richard J. Redding v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Cook v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2009