Legal Opinion

United States v. Berry

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided July 28, 1975No. NCM 74 2599PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

CEDARBURG, Chief Judge:

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 69, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 869, the record of the instant case was forwarded to this Court by the Judge Advocate General for review in accordance with Article 66, UCMJ, on the following issue:

Was the accused prejudiced by the fact that an attorney consulted by him in connection with the instant charges later acted as staff judge advocate to the officer who convened the investigation pursuant to Article 32, U.C.M.J.?

Appellant was tried by general court-martial and pursuant to his pleas of guilty was found guilty of 4…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. McCluskeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. MarrelliUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. CollierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. SerinoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
  2. United States v. HannonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. JolleyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API