Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Graham

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

Motion by third-party defendant for an order dismissing the amended third-party complaint under subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice is granted.

Two prior third-party complaints have been dismissed with leave to amend.

The complaint in the main action, a necessary part of our consideration on this motion to dismiss (Tripp, Guide to Motion Practice [1955--1962 Supp.], p. 63), seeks the recovery of a $2,000 down payment, plus $333.20 for expenses, from the defendant and third-party plaintiff, Sybil B. Graham. This *399complaint says: that the plaintiffs paid the defendant $2,000…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Gilchrest House, Inc. v. Guaranteed Title & Mortgage Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Howarth v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API